Printer Friendly Version Print this thread
Email this thread to a friend eMail this thread to a friend
  • php update question (In: Coding & Databases - PHP, ASP, Perl, etc.)
  • A question about article submit (In: Directories and Link Building)
  • Featured Web Site Template

    Hundreds More at Free Site Templates.com!

    Web Site Partners
    Sponsored Links
    Jet City Software
     
    Whos Here ?
    Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
    Moderator(s): Dinkar, Logan
    Member Message

    davidseo
    Joined: Jan 18, 2004
    # Posts: 87

    View the profile for davidseo Send davidseo a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-17 22:38
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Hey, Guys!

    I’ve got a web site whose homepage is all flash. To avoid the SE problem I put the homepage in frames and gave the SE’s <noframes> text to look at.

    Here are my questions:

    1. Is <noframes> text seen as less important by SE’s than regular on-page HTML? I really want to keep the flash page, but it’s becoming really important that this site gets ranking…

    2. I really only need one frame to hold the flash page. Can I do something like:

    <frameset rows="*">
    <frame src="mainpage.htm">
    </frameset>

    …or will the SE’s see that as some kind of trick?

    Thanks!




    bhartzer
    Staff
    Joined: Jun 08, 2000
    # Posts: 7042

    View the profile for bhartzer Send bhartzer a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-17 22:51
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    To rank well you'll really have to get rid of that flash page altogether. Another option is that you could cloak it, or you could make an html page that has the flash embedded in it and put the normal text on the page sort of 'behind' the flash content.

    Personally, though, I would get rid of the flash altogether.



    davidseo
    Joined: Jan 18, 2004
    # Posts: 87

    View the profile for davidseo Send davidseo a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-17 23:15
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Thanks bhartzer!

    How would I put the "normal text on the page sort of 'behind' the flash content"?





    davidseo
    Joined: Jan 18, 2004
    # Posts: 87

    View the profile for davidseo Send davidseo a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-17 23:35
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    I just came up with this idea. I don't know if anyone else has tried it, but I'd like your thoughts...

    I have a homepage that is full flash, which as I understand it is hurting me something fierce with the SE's.

    The problem is I really want to keep the flash page. It's for a web design course, and many of my students list the site design as one of the reasons they chose my course over another.

    I came up with an idea to keep the flash page. What I'm thinking is that I'll build an HTML homepage, and put a flash detector in it. If the user has flash, it'll take them to the flash homepage. If they don't, they'll stay where they are. That way I get an HTML homepage for the SE's, and most users will still see the flashy entrance.

    What do you guys think? Has anyone tried this?



    bhartzer
    Staff
    Joined: Jun 08, 2000
    # Posts: 7042

    View the profile for bhartzer Send bhartzer a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-17 23:57
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Your idea is exactly what you need to do. The bots don't have flash so they will get your real home page.

    Great idea, that's exactly what you need to do.



    Hampstead
    Joined: Feb 20, 2001
    # Posts: 2061

    View the profile for Hampstead Send Hampstead a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-18 13:15
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    I've done this many times - Works fine.



    davidseo
    Joined: Jan 18, 2004
    # Posts: 87

    View the profile for davidseo Send davidseo a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-18 23:10
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Okay, I set this up, but the html page displays for a second before it shoots to the flash page.

    Is there a good solution for this? It looks kinda jinky...



    Prowler
    Staff
    Joined: Aug 14, 2000
    # Posts: 1832

    View the profile for Prowler Send Prowler a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-19 11:13
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    In your case, you can try User Agent triggered serving of pages. This way many of the older version of browsers (the minuscule percentage who still uses them)will gracefully 'degrade' to the HTML version.

    Robots will see only the HTML version like the older version of browsers.



    davidseo
    Joined: Jan 18, 2004
    # Posts: 87

    View the profile for davidseo Send davidseo a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-19 16:58
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Okay, here's what I did to solve my problem.

    I fixed the flash sniffer redirect, which fixed the problem I was having with the page displaying for a second before the sniffer worked. I put the <NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT> tags in the body, surrounding everything except the tall image at the top.

    Now:

    1. Flash users see the flash page.
    2. Non-Fash users with JavaScript see the "no_flash_index.htm" page.
    3. Non-JavaScript users see the noscript portion of the homepage.
    4. the "no_flash_index.htm" is the same as the homepage, so I used a meta noindex nofollow.


    Yea!

    [ Message was edited by: davidseo 11/19/2004 09:51 am ]





    davidseo
    Joined: Jan 18, 2004
    # Posts: 87

    View the profile for davidseo Send davidseo a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-19 17:59
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Now, I've got a new problem, though. Setting the site up like this effectively traps users in the site if they try to use their back button. I seem to remember that there is a code I can use that keeps the first page out of the browser's history. If I use that code, does it affect the SE's in any way?

    Btw, does anyone remember the code I'm talking about?




    davidseo
    Joined: Jan 18, 2004
    # Posts: 87

    View the profile for davidseo Send davidseo a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-19 22:39
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    One more silly issue.

    Now that my index jumps right away to another page, how do I see my page rank?



    unreviewed
    Joined: Dec 07, 2000
    # Posts: 6776

    View the profile for unreviewed Send unreviewed a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-19 22:45
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    In your browser setting disable Meta Refresh, in IE it is found in your security settings, click on custom settings.



    g1smd
    Staff
    Joined: Jul 28, 2002
    # Posts: 10465

    View the profile for g1smd Send g1smd a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-19 23:31
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Aaaarggh!

    Another person chasing pagerank, rather then looking at where their site is placed in the SERPs for relevant searches!

    Don't fall under the spell of the little green bar!



    Hampstead
    Joined: Feb 20, 2001
    # Posts: 2061

    View the profile for Hampstead Send Hampstead a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-22 09:26
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    David - I have PM'd you an example of how to use the flsh detect to aid ranking.



    St0n3y
    Joined: May 01, 2002
    # Posts: 1620

    View the profile for St0n3y Send St0n3y a private message

    Posted: 2004-Nov-22 15:27
    Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

    Another person chasing pagerank, rather then looking at where their site is placed in the SERPs for relevant searches!

    Don't fall under the spell of the little green bar!


    Not to get this discussion off track, but while I agree with you, g1smd, in theory, the practice of such is, unfortunately, quite illogical.

    Too many others use the little green bar as a measure of relevance for a site, therefore a visible (and good) PR must remain somewhat of a consideration for that reason alone. I can't tell you how I wish that the PR bar would just go away, but its there and must be considered solely because OTHERS consider it.

    Kind of a catch-22!


    You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
    1. You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
    2. You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
    3. This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.

    If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions contained within.

    If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.

    If you are still experiencing problem, please read the Login Assistance Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.

    Switch to Advanced Editor and ... Create a New Topic or Reply to this Thread

    New posts Forum is locked
    © 1995  ·  iWeb, Inc  ·  DBA JimWorld Productions